gcj/214

[Jeff Sturm]

The following reply was made to PR gcj/214; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@sigma6.com>
To: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com, tromey@cygnus.com, apbianco@cygnus.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: gcj/214
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:49:15 -0400

 Tom Tromey wrote:
 > 2. Is pointer alignment sufficient?  On x86 I think doubles have
 >    stricter alignment than pointers.
 
 Good question.  It turns out that double arrays are broken on x86, both
 with and without this patch.
 
 Take the test case above, replace `int' with `double' and try it.
 
 You want me to submit a new bug?
 
 -- 
 Jeff Sturm
 jsturm@sigma6.com