gcj/205: gcjh confused about similar method and attribute names

[Bryce McKinlay]

The following reply was made to PR gcj/205; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
To: osk@hem.passagen.se
Cc: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gcj/205: gcjh confused about similar method and attribute names
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:32:51 +1200

 osk@hem.passagen.se wrote:
 
 > As you can see, the "inlined" method should really
 > return foo__, not foo.
 
 Thanks for the bug report. This reminds me of PR gcj/75, which is listed
 as "open" and claims that gcjh will not accept such classes at all. It
 looks as though the bug has been partially fixed (duplicate field names
 are suffixed with "__"), but "inlined" methods are not apparantly aware of
 this.
 
 regards
 
   [ bryce ]