[ping**2] libjava cross-compilation patches

[Sandra Loosemore]

On 05/20/2013 02:03 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 01:27 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 08:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> We've been trying to get this set of configuration patches to support
>>> cross-compilation of libjava approved since 2009; most recently I pinged
>>> them last July.  Can somebody please review them?
>>
>> I'm sorry.  They look OK to me; please commit.
>>
>> I presume that you have re-checked them with the testsuite and the
>> current
>> sources.  If you have any test failures please let us know.
>
> I actually have not done that yet, but I will do so before committing
> anything.  I was hesitant to spend a lot of time on refreshing the
> patches given the previous lack of interest in them.  :-P

For the record, here is what I checked in (minus all the auto-generated 
bits).  I did a cross build to powerpc-linux-gnu and verified that it's 
no longer dropping target-specific/multilib-specific things in lib/ and 
that the pieces fixed by this patch appear in a more reasonable place. 
It doesn't look like libjava supports remote installed-tree testing yet 
but I did regression-test on x86_64 native instead.

-Sandra

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libjava.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 2130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20130522/70798b22/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libjava.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4125 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20130522/70798b22/attachment-0001.bin>