[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 20 15:28:00 GMT 2011
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Certainly: your wiki entry gives a good overview. For the moment, I'll
> probably concentrate on the build side of things, though. I may attack
> gthr* stuff and fp-bit.[ch] next, both of which I can at least partially
> test on my targets.
fp-bit.[ch] has the interesting issue of FLOAT_BIT_ORDER_MISMATCH and
FLOAT_WORD_ORDER_MISMATCH being defined by makefile rules when it ought to
be possible to deduce that information from macros predefined by the
compiler. (See what I said in
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02262.html> about the
meanings of those macros.)
dfp-bit.* and fixed-bit.* can probably move along with fp-bit.* (or
before, or after), and I don't think there are any complicated issues
around those files.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list