libffi merge

Mon Jun 8 16:50:00 GMT 2009

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM, NightStrike<> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tom Tromey<> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <> writes:
>> Ralf> Would standalone libffi be willing to accept into its tree
>> Ralf> configury parts that are only active in the GCC tree?
>> If this is possible, why have a separate libffi repository at all?
>> You could just tell developers to:
>>    svn co svn://
>> Tom
> This would be ideal.  This whole "keep the same stuff in multiple
> places and hope they're in synch" situation is terrible.

Also, I'm kind of sure that you can use svn externals to just link the
libffi directory in gcc's repo to the libffi repository.

More information about the Java-patches mailing list