libffi merge

Andrew Haley
Mon Jun 8 16:35:00 GMT 2009

Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <> writes:
> Ralf> Would standalone libffi be willing to accept into its tree
> Ralf> configury parts that are only active in the GCC tree?
> If this is possible, why have a separate libffi repository at all?
> You could just tell developers to:
>     svn co svn://

And we'd have to check into gcc bits of configury that are no longer
relevant to gcc.  But I'm looking at all possibilities.

Anyway, if the repos are not massively different then merging is trivial.


More information about the Java-patches mailing list