libffi merge

Andrew Haley
Sat Jun 6 08:21:00 GMT 2009

NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Haley<> wrote:
>> Andreas Tobler wrote:
>>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Index:
>>> Do we really want that? As I remember we wanted to test against the
>>> built libraries from gcc. Also, we have multilib configs in gcc which
>>> will no longer be tested with the above, or not correctly.
>> Okay, so we will need to diverge the testsuite between libffi and gcc.  That's
>> perfectly okay, as long as we clearly mark the section **** DO NOT MERGE ***
>> Or something...
> Wouldn't it be ideal for the libffi in the gcc tree to be identical to
> upstream, so that this mess doesn't occur again?

Of course it would, but the configury is not different just for the sake
of it, it's because the requirements are different.  I don't want there
to be any differences at all, but we have to do what is possible.


More information about the Java-patches mailing list