libffi merge

NightStrike nightstrike@gmail.com
Sat Jun 6 02:58:00 GMT 2009


On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Haley<aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> Andreas Tobler wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> Index: libffi.call/closure_loc_fn0.c
>> Do we really want that? As I remember we wanted to test against the
>> built libraries from gcc. Also, we have multilib configs in gcc which
>> will no longer be tested with the above, or not correctly.
>
> Okay, so we will need to diverge the testsuite between libffi and gcc.  That's
> perfectly okay, as long as we clearly mark the section **** DO NOT MERGE ***
> Or something...

Wouldn't it be ideal for the libffi in the gcc tree to be identical to
upstream, so that this mess doesn't occur again?



More information about the Java-patches mailing list