Patch for java documentation, PR java/6993
Marco Trudel
marco@mtsystems.ch
Mon Feb 23 18:13:00 GMT 2009
Steve Ellcey wrote:
> While looking at some documentation issues I came across PR java/6993
> which says that the limitation that all files must have the .java suffix
> on them when compiling multiple files is no longer applicable and that
> the documentation to that effect should be removed.
At least compiling .class and .java files together broke around January
2007 (I think the change to ecj was the reason):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30515
So I guess in the limitation is applicable again...
Marco
> (This was from 2003.)
> Can we just remove that comment from the gcj man page?
>
> Here is a patch to just delete that comment. OK to checkin?
>
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
>
>
>
>
> 2009-02-23 Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
>
> PR java/6993
> * gcj.texi (Options): Remove comment about input file name
> restriction.
>
>
> Index: gcj.texi
> ===================================================================
> --- gcj.texi (revision 144379)
> +++ gcj.texi (working copy)
> @@ -214,8 +214,6 @@ single output file, named @var{FILENAME}
> This is allowed even when using @code{-S} or @code{-c},
> but not when using @code{-C} or @code{--resource}.
> (This is an extension beyond the what plain @command{gcc} allows.)
> -(If more than one input file is specified, all must currently
> -be @code{.java} files, though we hope to fix this.)
>
> @node Input Options
> @section Input Options
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list