Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb 15, 2007, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:

> It is ok to have the libjava code directly call ffi_closure_alloc and
> ffi_closure_free.  We're already making direct calls to the various
> ffi functions, so this extra layer isn't needed.

Done in the revised patch below.  Retested on x86_64-linux-gnu.  Ok to
install?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libffi-closure-prot-exec-dlmalloc.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 185459 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20070218/38bea013/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libffi-closure-prot-exec.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 90876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20070218/38bea013/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libffi-closure-prot-exec-TestClosureGC.jar
Type: application/x-java-archive
Size: 3997 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20070218/38bea013/attachment.jar>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}