revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)

[Sandra Loosemore]

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 09:50, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>> this is report from memory tester, overall it seems to be slight memory
>> consumption increase. Are there any plans to get the memory back?
> 
> Sandra said in a mail last week that there is supposed to be a ~2%
> memory saving (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00945.html).
> That is a number that should be visible in your measurements.  Are you
> and Sandra measuring the same thing?

I expect that the current mainline version does show a memory use regression. 
As I mentioned in another e-mail, I have two additional patches from the LTO 
branch that I need to bring over to clobber some critical cases where temporary 
lists are being constructed.  I will try to get to that today.  Anyway, my 
measurements on the LTO branch were made with those two additional patches in place.

-Sandra