uncertain patch: foo_LINK needs foo_LDFLAGS

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Fri Dec 22 12:35:00 GMT 2006


>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:

Adam> Without this patch, the invocations of gcj to build the various tools
Adam> lack the --main=XXX flag.  The patch below seemed like the right way
Adam> to fix this, but I'm left wondering how this worked in the first
Adam> place.  Am I missing something big here?  Does this work as-is for
Adam> other people?

Automake adds _LDFLAGS to the link automatically.  E.g., from
Makefile.in:

jv-convert$(EXEEXT): $(jv_convert_OBJECTS) $(jv_convert_DEPENDENCIES) 
	@rm -f jv-convert$(EXEEXT)
	$(jv_convert_LINK) $(jv_convert_LDFLAGS) $(jv_convert_OBJECTS) $(jv_convert_LDADD) $(LIBS)

Tom



More information about the Java-patches mailing list