[RFC/JVMTI] GetMethodDeclaringClass

[Keith Seitz]

Andrew Haley wrote:

>  > Perhaps I'm being too paranoid?
> 
> Sure.  I guess you want a debugger to be robust even when the runtime
> is FUBAR, but this seems a little extreme.

Okay, one last question... I have implemented the changes as you 
suggest, and (of course) they are much, much, much, (much, much, ...) 
simpler.

 > AFAICS we just need to make sure that all methods for interpreted
 > classes are pushed with _Jv_PushClass.  [snip]

In May 2006, a patch was committed to explicitly exclud interpreted 
class methods from showing up in ncodeMap:

2006-05-31  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>

         * stacktrace.cc (_Jv_StackTrace::UpdateNCodeMap): Don't add
         interpreted classes.

Something about powerpc64-linux stacktrace failures? Original discussion 
here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q2/msg00261.html

Before I submit this, is this going to be a problem? I don't have access 
to a ppc64-linux box (that I know of, at least).

Keith