[RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Fri Sep 29 21:23:00 GMT 2006


David> Correct me if I am wrong, but don't most of the gij test cases use it?

Keith meant the old "pure bytecode" interpreter.  You have to build
libgcj specially to get this -- the default is to use the direct
threaded interpreter, which is faster but uses more memory.

Tom



More information about the Java-patches mailing list