[PATCH] New predicate covering NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Mon Dec 5 17:06:00 GMT 2005
>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com> writes:
Roger> If we could get the Java maintainers help with sorting out the
Roger> patch_cast issue, I'd prefer that we make a instantaneous
Roger> surgical change, rather than the churn of a transition via
Roger> NOP_CONVERSION_P. Perhaps the Java front-end needs a front-end
Roger> tree code to distinguish user casts from the middle-end's
Roger> NOP_EXPRs?
Yeah, I would suggest making a new java-specific tree code that
represents a cast written by the user. It only has to stick around
for the generating-class-file case. Another plausible approach would
be a flag on the NOP_EXPR.
Tom
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list