[patch] Fix PR23230 - wrong code generated in inner class

[Bryce McKinlay]

Robin Green wrote:

>>Jacks is most likely not the place for such a testcase - AFAICT, they
>>only check for compilation success, error or warning.
>>    
>>
>
>That's not the case. There are runtime tests as well. It is a JLS test not a
>test of any specific API, so it should go in Jacks, I think - but I will
>double-check on that when I submit it.
>  
>

Regression tests for gcj PRs should go in libjava/testsuite, so please 
include the regression test when you check in your patch. Tests that are 
actually in the gcc tree are more likely to get run by "random gcc 
hackers", so its good to have as many tests in there as possible.

Of course, if no test for this currently exists in jacks, then it would 
be great to put it in there as well.

Bryce