[patch ping] libffi: SH: Unreviewed patches

[Joern RENNECKE]

Kaz Kojima wrote:

>Ping?  Now it's needed to fix the failure for cls_1_1byte.c on
>sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00672.html
>
>BTW, I'm happy if someone reviews the following patch which
>is 10 months old now :-)
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg01063.html
>  
>
I don't see anything wrong with these patches, but on the other
hand, I can't really confirm that they do the right thing.
Considering that you wrote most of the sh libffi, and also appear
to do most of the testing with libffi, I suppose you are the de-facto
maintainer of the SH libffi port.  So on that basis, I say these
patches are OK to check in.

Moreover, I think we should ask the GCC steering comittee to
officially extend your maintainership to SH libffi.
Alexandre, do you agree?