No subject

Geoffrey Keating
Wed Jun 29 23:17:00 GMT 2005

Mark Mitchell <> writes:

> Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> > Mark,
> > Could we get an exemption from the freeze rules for low-risk,
> > runtime only libgcj fixes as determined by the libgcj maintainers?
> I don't think we want to do that.
> First, we're close to a release.  We've been waiting on one fix since
> Friday, and Jeff Law has promised to fix it today.
> Second, the whole point of freezes is to ensure stability.  We're
> going to RC3 on this release because we've found bad problems in RC1
> and RC2. If a change were to be checked in, for whatever reason,
> happens to break something, then we need an RC4, and everybody loses.

This kind of conflict is solved in version control systems by the use
of branches...

More information about the Java-patches mailing list