4.0.2/4.1 PATCH: Enforce PIC code for mips libffi (PR libgcj/21943)
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@linux-mips.org
Fri Jun 10 15:55:00 GMT 2005
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> As so often with MIPS stuff, no-one would have really wanted the
> >> current situation. Having GAS default to one thing and GCC default
> >> to the opposite is just plain silly. The problem is, once you have
> >> that silliness, none of the possible ways of resolving it are
> >> "obviously" better than the others.
> >
> > Agreed. And I'm glad both default to the same settings consistently for
> > Linux.
> > [...]
> > Well, if you want to keep the IRIX setup strange, please feel free --
> > frankly I don't care at all.
>
> Huh? Like you said yourself in your earlier reply, mips*-linux-gnu GAS
> defaults to non-PIC too, just like IRIX does. My point was that it's silly
> to have mips*-linux-gnu GAS default to one thing (when invoked directly)
> and mips*-linux-gnu GCC to default to the opposite.
The underlying tool defaults to non-PIC, but if invoked through the GCC
driver it does not. As a result the behaviour of the setup is consistent
for Linux -- for any language, including assembly, GCC produces PIC code
by default and non-PIC if run with the "-mno-abicalls" option. Your
reason for doing it differently for IRIX is not immediately clear to me,
but if you find it important, I won't argue.
Of course normal users (i.e. non-toolchain developers) don't run gas
directly, so the internals of the setup (no matter how silly) are not
interesting to them -- it's the end result they care about.
Maciej
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list