PR java/19285: Interfaces not initialized by static field access

[Andrew Haley]

Bryce McKinlay writes:
 > 
 > Err, well thats where we run into the problems I mentioned above. What 
 > version ID should the branch use? Although the ABI between 4.0 and 4.1 
 > is the same now, its quite likely that we'll make further changes in 4.1 
 > - thus 4.0.1 shouldn't be using 4.1's ID.

If we have to make an ABI change that means trunk is different from
branch at the point of a release, then we'll have to bump the ABI# on
trunk.

I quite like the idea of an "in between" digit, but AFAICS we don't
need to worry about that now.

Andrew.