[patch] make gij command-line compatible with java
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Sat Apr 2 01:15:00 GMT 2005
>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> writes:
Tom> This new patch incorporates all your suggestions and updates the
Tom> manual's CNI and "Invoking gij" sections.
Thanks for making these changes. There are a couple little problems
with the texi change, then I think it is good to go.
Tom> +supported @code{-X} options. Currently these options are supported:
Tom> +
Tom> +@item -Xms@var{size}
Tom> +Set the initial heap size.
Tom> +
Tom> +@item -Xmx@var{size}
Tom> +Set the maximum heap size.
Tom> +
I think this will format somewhat strangely, since these @items will
appear with the main list. I think probably a sub-list is needed
instead, meaning a nested @table. (Though I'm not completely sure
that nested @tables are allowed in texinfo, you'd have to look.)
Tom> +@code{gij} also recognizes and ignores the following options, for
Tom> +compatibility with existing application launch scripts: -client,
Tom> +-server, -hotspot, -jrockit, -agentlib, -agentpath, -debug, -d32,
Tom> +-d64, -javaagent and -noclassgc.
Options mentioned in plain text should be wrapped in @code{}.
Tom> +Calls malloc. Throws java.lang.OutOfMemoryError if alloction fails.
Typo "alloction". Also, function and class names should be wrapped
in @code{}. There are a few instances of this.
Tom
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list