Fallout (mostly runtime library-related) from GCC version number change (take two)
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Fri Mar 18 12:19:00 GMT 2005
Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>Sure and easy.
>>
>>What happens here, on x86-linux, for a very simple
>>--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-exp configure, is that the whole set of
>>libstdc++ headers, that should be installed under
>>/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/4.1.0/, ends up inside
>>/usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/const/
>>
>>
>Hmm. I get them in $prefix/include/c++, no intermediate directory.
>That's not right either, I take it?
>
>
Hum, yes, unfortunately.
Basically (cmp also
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01542.html) what is
currently happening is that in the whole installed tree, where '4.1.0'
should appear you find 'const' instead.
That 4.1.0 intermediate directory should be restored everywhere not removed.
Paolo.
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list