Fallout (mostly runtime library-related) from GCC version number change (take two)

Zack Weinberg zack@codesourcery.com
Fri Mar 18 10:17:00 GMT 2005


Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>>It appears so.  At least, my trial 'make install' (done, note, without
>>--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs) appears to have created a
>>correct directory tree.  If you could tell me which files are being
>>installed incorrectly for you, I can check that they are installed
>>correctly with my patch.
>>  
>>
> Sure and easy.
>
> What happens here, on x86-linux, for a very simple
> --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-exp configure, is that the whole set of
> libstdc++ headers, that should be installed under
> /usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/4.1.0/, ends up inside
> /usr/local/gcc-exp/include/c++/const/

Hmm.  I get them in $prefix/include/c++, no intermediate directory.
That's not right either, I take it?

zw



More information about the Java-patches mailing list