[Patch] Fix Socket read returns EOF when count == 0...
David Daney
ddaney@avtrex.com
Tue Mar 15 19:04:00 GMT 2005
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:58:09AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>
>>Michael Koch wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:16:54PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>>>
>>>>Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"David" == David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>David> Tested on the HEAD on i686-pc-linux with make check in libjava with no
>>>>>David> regressions. No regressions in mauve in the 4.0 branch (HEAD not
>>>>>David> tested in mauve due to ICE in mauve)
>>>>>David> 2005-03-14 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
>>>>>David> * gnu/java/net/natPlainSocketImplPosix.cc (read_helper): Handle
>>>>>David> count == 0 case.
>>>>>David> O.K to commit to HEAD?
>>>>>David> How about the 4.0 branch for good measure?
>>>>>Yes to both. Thanks.
>>>>>FWIW I think the Win32 code needs this as well.
>>>>
>>>>FWIW I don't currently have a mandate to fix/test Win32 things (x86-linux is pushing it).
>>>
>>>I think it falls under the obvious rule in this case.
>>
>>It may be obvious, but my understanding of the 'obvious' rule as it applies to code is that the All-patches-must-be-thoroughly-tested rule still applies.
>>
>>I will not be testing Win32 code so it seems that I should not be committing random changes to it either.
>
>
> Then please file at least a bug for it so it dont gets forgotten.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20486
David Daney
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list