Patch: FYI: wrong number for test case

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Mon Feb 14 23:28:00 GMT 2005


I'm checking this in.

Andrew Pinski pointed out that I had used the wrong PR number for a
test case I checked in.  Bogus!  Fixed as appended.

Tom

Index: ChangeLog
from  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
	* testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out: Renamed from PR19929.out.
	* testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java: Renamed from PR19929.java.

Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java 14 Feb 2005 20:49:02 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+interface I {
+    void f(Object x);
+}
+
+class PR19929 {
+    static void g(I i) {
+      // gcj used to create invalid bytecode for this.
+      i.f(new Object[1][1]);
+    }
+  public static void main(String[] args) { }
+}
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
--- testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java 14 Feb 2005 20:04:35 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-interface I {
-    void f(Object x);
-}
-
-class PR19929 {
-    static void g(I i) {
-      // gcj used to create invalid bytecode for this.
-      i.f(new Object[1][1]);
-    }
-  public static void main(String[] args) { }
-}
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out



More information about the Java-patches mailing list