Patch: FYI: wrong number for test case
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Mon Feb 14 23:28:00 GMT 2005
I'm checking this in.
Andrew Pinski pointed out that I had used the wrong PR number for a
test case I checked in. Bogus! Fixed as appended.
Tom
Index: ChangeLog
from Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out: Renamed from PR19929.out.
* testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java: Renamed from PR19929.java.
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.java 14 Feb 2005 20:49:02 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+interface I {
+ void f(Object x);
+}
+
+class PR19929 {
+ static void g(I i) {
+ // gcj used to create invalid bytecode for this.
+ i.f(new Object[1][1]);
+ }
+ public static void main(String[] args) { }
+}
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19921.out
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java
--- testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.java 14 Feb 2005 20:04:35 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-interface I {
- void f(Object x);
-}
-
-class PR19929 {
- static void g(I i) {
- // gcj used to create invalid bytecode for this.
- i.f(new Object[1][1]);
- }
- public static void main(String[] args) { }
-}
Index: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out
===================================================================
RCS file: testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out
diff -N testsuite/libjava.lang/PR19929.out
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list