PATCH: waitpid in natPosixProcess.cc
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Wed Apr 21 17:38:00 GMT 2004
>>>>> "Casey" == Casey Marshall <csm@gnu.org> writes:
Casey> Also: shouldn't there be a finalize method in this class, that
Casey> destroys and waits on the process?
Actually Process is explicitly defined otherwise:
The subprocess is not killed when there are no more references to the
Process object, but rather the subprocess continues executing
asynchronously.
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11801
This has some suggestions for what to do; nothing very pleasant though.
Tom
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list