PATCH: FYI: Remove JvAllocObject and add fields to Class for interpreter/JIT data

[Bryce McKinlay]

Bryce McKinlay wrote:

> OK. I was planning on changing the implementation of 
> _Jv_IsInterpretedClass to use aux_id, but thinking about it more I'm 
> starting to think the whole idea is not so great. If the interpreter's 
> resolver, etc, were more cleanely organised then it should probably 
> not even need to map from java.lang.Class to _Jv_InterpretedClass. As 
> it stands this mapping is quite ugly/unsafe due to the "void*" casting.
>
> But, we do need this patch because the interpreter is currently broken 
> without it - so I'm going to remove aux_id and check it in.


Here's the patch that I just checked in.

Regards

Bryce


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: interpret-alloc-4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 22862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20040420/064b75b6/attachment.bin>