Patch: java.net.URLStreamHandler

Jeff Sturm jsturm@one-point.com
Tue Oct 28 22:36:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > IMHO the comment should also have been killed at the time of
> > merging with classpath.
>
> Why? The comment explains observed behaviour of another implementation
> which we think is not according to spec. I think it is helpfull since it
> explains the rational we use for not following this behaviour.

*shrug* I tend to use comments mostly as a means of understanding the code
that follows, and this comment doesn't really say anything helpful about
the code.

Notes about implementation divergences could well go into Mauve.  Folks
who care about compliance are likely to carefully examine the test cases
anyway.  But that's just my opinion.

Jeff



More information about the Java-patches mailing list