FYI: Patch: java.text.SimpleDateFormat
Bryce McKinlay
bryce@mckinlay.net.nz
Sun Sep 28 04:26:00 GMT 2003
On Sunday, Sep 28, 2003, at 11:04 Pacific/Auckland, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 22:21, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
>> Can you give me a pointer to the failing mauve test?
>
> Without the patch the following four mauve tests fail:
> FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.text.SimpleDateFormat.regress: CDT (number 1)
> FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.text.SimpleDateFormat.regress: EDT (number 1)
> FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.text.SimpleDateFormat.regress: EST (number 1)
> FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.text.SimpleDateFormat.regress: PDT (number 1)
Thanks Mark.
The real problem here is that setTimeZone() was being called on the
underlying calendar. This is not necessary since the ZONE_OFFSET field
has the same effect, without overwriting the timezone which the user
set and "sticking" across a calendar.clear() call. The cloning approach
only worked by chance, since it reset the calendar's timezone to GMT
which just happened to be what the test case expected.
I'm checking in this patch to libgcj & classpath.
Regards
Bryce.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Calendar.patch.txt
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20030928/9d59f239/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list