Patch: New version of "UTF-16 to 'Win32 locale' conversions" and filenames (replacing convertion tables with Win32 API calls)
João Garcia
jgarcia@uk2.net
Thu Sep 18 13:10:00 GMT 2003
Hi Mohan,
Mohan Embar wrote:
>If you post a patch for 3.4 and a testcase, I will put out a binary
>on my website which incorporates this patch, even if the patch might
>not make it to the mainline.
>
I'll do that (using only A functions -- less things to modify and less
things to test).
Thanks!
> this will help a lot of MinGW people in
>the meantime.
>
I agree.
>I'd be interested in initially exploring a solution which invokes the
>W file functions on WinNT and the A file functions on Win9x.
>
I have a draft for something like that (I didn't finish debuging W calls
sections -- I can recall a segmentation fault somewhere). As the patch
is, it chooses between A and W functions "on-the-fly", based on platform
detection. This leeds to code duplication...
I think that you would like to do the choice as a build option (or, at
least, I might be happy with this option...). Or, probably, support only
W functions (I don't blame you for that and I can always build my own
binaries).
>Do you want to do this investigation?
>
I can do it (time permitting). For me, it would be just to adapt the old
patch (and debug it).
> If not, would you have any objections
>to my looking into it (time permitting)?
>
>
I have no objections if you (or anyone else) would like to finish this
first.
But we would both loose time.
I think I can propose something before the end of September.
Would you wish to do it yourself sooner?
>Thanks for working on this.
>
>
You are welcome! But this is a small contribution... I am glad if it can
be of any use at all!
From my part, many thanks to you for all your contributions to this
project. And many thanks to all the people that make the gcc/gcj project
work. It is a magnificent project and it is getting better and better
all the time!
João
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list