[Java PATCH] An attempt at removing a "Gross hack"

Steven Bosscher s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl
Mon Jul 21 11:05:00 GMT 2003


Zack suggested in a private conversation that setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE
should also force a function to be emitted.

Bootstrapped and regtested with no new failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu,
(but I'm not sure if regtesting also covers this code...).  Is this OK
for mainline?

Gr.
Steven


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ChangeLog.entry
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20030721/46d94ca8/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gross_hack.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1336 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20030721/46d94ca8/attachment.bin>


More information about the Java-patches mailing list