PATCH: java/done.html -- remove obsolete reference to ADFC

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2003, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Given that in Java-land currently there seems little capacity for
>> web page maintainance, it might be better to avoid maintaining such
>> a list at all, though?
> I'd rather keep them for the time being.

Sure, that's fine (as long as I may take care of broken links and
such, and in the worst case, such as this, remove "broken" entries).

> I think the importance of this sort of thing will drop once gcj
> becomes more widely used -- nobody needs a "done with gcc" page.

Hopefully!

> What do you think of that?

Full agreed.  I'm just extra careful when updating /java web pages
because I'm afraid of stepping on someones toes; on the other hand
  http://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html
still refers to GCC 3.2, and
  http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/gcj-status.html
refers to GCC 3.3 as something in the future, so I'm not sure whether
I shouldn't try to help a bit more there?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/