RFC: Moving native code in java.net into architecture dependant files - updated patch
Richard Earnshaw
rearnsha@arm.com
Mon Mar 24 13:32:00 GMT 2003
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 24. März 2003 13:09 schrieb Richard Earnshaw:
> > > Am Montag, 24. März 2003 12:27 schrieb Richard Earnshaw:
> > > > 2003-03-17 Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
> > > >
> > > > + * configure.in: Create links to architecture dependent files,
> > > > + introduced PLATFORMNET variable (set to NoNet for newlib
> > > > usage). + * configure: Regenerated.
> > > > + * java/net/natInetAddressNoNet.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natInetAddressPosix.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natInetAddressWin32.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natNetworkInterfaceNoNet.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natNetworkInterfacePosix.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natNetworkInterfaceWin32.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImplNoNet.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImplPosix.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImplWin32.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainSocketImplNoNet.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainSocketImplPosix.cc,
> > > > + java/net/natPlainSocketImplWin32.cc: New files.
> > >
> > > I hate that news.
> >
> > Don't we all :-(
> >
> > > I have made a patch for you. Can you please test it and tell me
> > > if its wourking now ?
> >
> > What about the natPlainSocketImpl problem (problem 3 in previous
> > mail)?
>
> Hmm, I hoped that would be fixed with the include of gcj/cni.h but I
> was just a little bit blind. Here the next try.
>
Yep, that works. Thanks.
R.
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list