[PATCH] undef MPROTECT_VDB for darwin?

[Andreas Tobler]

Boehm, Hans wrote:
> That's fine.  Andrew and Tom had concluded that it would make sense to reintegrate my latest tree into the gcc tree.  But it wasn't completely clear that someone with the right CVS expertise had the time to do so.  This would also get fixed as part of such a merge.
> 
> There are of course still problems with Darwin threads and dynamic libraries ...


Hm, do they really plan also on 3.3? If not it would be a little step 
towards a cleaning up.

I know there are things with darwin, at least I tried the latest tar and 
the dylib was built :)

On some libgcj testcases I get spurious failures which end in boehm-gc. 
FileHandleGcTest.

I could help testing if you need some results.

So I wait until this merge will happen.

Thanks,
Andreas