Patch: platform usleep function

Tom Tromey
Thu Dec 19 17:33:00 GMT 2002

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <> writes:

Jeff> Is there any reason to prefer usleep over nanosleep?

Nope.  I just picked it since it is what we used to use.

Jeff> The latter is POSIX compatible and doesn't require signals.

Ok.  I wonder if we'll need a configure check for this.
Hopefully Anthony's (forthcoming :-) xscale-elf builds will tell us.

I'll update the patch once the Win32 bits are written.


More information about the Java-patches mailing list