FYI: More expected Mauve test failures

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

The following is the result of discussions on the java mailinglist and 
adding the appropriate PRs for some of the remaining Mauve test
failures.

2002-04-21  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>

    * mauve-libgcj: Don't run java.lang.ref tests since they are buggy.

2002-04-21  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>

    * libjava.mauve/xfail: Expect failures for PR java/6391 and
    libgcj/6389.

This leaves us with just one unexpected failure for
gnu.testlet.java.lang.Math.min which I still have to analyze.

Cheers,

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mauve-libgcj.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 585 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20020421/6ea49ebf/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xfail.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1449 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java-patches/attachments/20020421/6ea49ebf/attachment-0001.bin>