Patch: gcj access$0 error

[Alexandre Petit-Bianco]

Tom Tromey writes:

> Alex> Meanwhile, your patch seems correct to me and improves things a
> Alex> lot. I ran some supplemental tests, it shows no regressions and
> Alex> improves the situation a lot with old snapshots of freenet and
> Alex> tomcat. Please check it in both the branch and the trunk for the
> Alex> time being (unless your clarification unravels more changes to
> Alex> be made to it.)
> 
> I'm checking it in.  I think it is an improvement.  If there are
> further cases that fail, well, they probably also fail without the
> patch.

I saw such exceptional improvements with your patch that I needed to
double check and yesterday I came to the conclusion that my previous
runs were bogus (and I don't have any explanation for it :-(, but I'm
taking measures to prevent this from happening again.)

Thanks,

./A