WIN-25.1: natPlainSocketImpl.cc [UPDATED]

[Bryce McKinlay]

Adam Megacz wrote:

>>I'd prefer to get rid of the _Jv_recv template hack.
>>
>
>I don't know why it's in there, nor do I have access to platforms on
>which it might break -- I'm not a good candidate to fix it.
>

I'm not sure why it would break anything, most other sockets code I've 
looked at seems to have no portability problems with recv().

Tom, what was the original problem that required the _Jv_recv() hack?

Bryce.