libstdc++ libtool lossage

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Sat Feb 23 12:42:00 GMT 2002


On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:29:28AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> "gcc -shared -shared-libgcc" is redundant and wrong.

No it isn't.  Why do you insist otherwise?

> 	If you need something special for your target, make a
> target-specific change, e.g., override CXX_FOR_TARGET in top-level config
> or some other target-dependent location.

No, what I'd like is for the X libraries to be linked
without libgcc.so.  I'd like the gnome libraries to be
linked without libgcc.so.

How does changing gcc's top-level config affect that?


r~



More information about the Java-patches mailing list