libstdc++ libtool lossage
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sat Feb 23 12:42:00 GMT 2002
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:29:28AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> "gcc -shared -shared-libgcc" is redundant and wrong.
No it isn't. Why do you insist otherwise?
> If you need something special for your target, make a
> target-specific change, e.g., override CXX_FOR_TARGET in top-level config
> or some other target-dependent location.
No, what I'd like is for the X libraries to be linked
without libgcc.so. I'd like the gnome libraries to be
linked without libgcc.so.
How does changing gcc's top-level config affect that?
r~
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list