ia64 eh, part 20d [libjava]
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sat Mar 31 12:39:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:27:15PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This should mention removal of -fasynchronous-exceptions. But is that
> removal actually correct? Maybe we should use -fnon-call-exceptions?
> (Or maybe you added it directly to the compiler? I didn't read the
> gcj patches.)
Actually, someone else added it to the compiler a while ago.
I moved the setting of the flag around, but it was definitely
there before my changes.
> Could you change this to remove the compat-include case?
> We only needed that when libgcj could be built in a separate tree from
> gcc. I don't see any need to continue to support that.
Sure.
> I think abort() here is reasonable. You can remove the FIXME.
Right.
r~
More information about the Java-patches
mailing list