ia64 eh, part 20d [libjava]

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Sat Mar 31 12:39:00 GMT 2001


On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:27:15PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This should mention removal of -fasynchronous-exceptions.  But is that
> removal actually correct?  Maybe we should use -fnon-call-exceptions?
> (Or maybe you added it directly to the compiler?  I didn't read the
> gcj patches.)

Actually, someone else added it to the compiler a while ago.
I moved the setting of the flag around, but it was definitely
there before my changes.

> Could you change this to remove the compat-include case?
> We only needed that when libgcj could be built in a separate tree from
> gcc.  I don't see any need to continue to support that.

Sure.

> I think abort() here is reasonable.  You can remove the FIXME.

Right.


r~



More information about the Java-patches mailing list