`make install` should install the info files in java

[Bryce McKinlay]

"Joseph S. Myers" wrote:

> On 26 Mar 2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> > I noticed one problem when running make install and have therefore a
> > questions: Should `make install` install all info files or not?  I
> > noticed that libjava uses in Makefile.am the automake option
> > "no-installinfo" which means that:
>
> make install should install all info files, but how can you generate info
> from the libjava files?  They just seem to be fragments, without any main
> file including them into some sort of framework as a manual at all.

I'd been intending to get rid of the .texi files in libjava/doc, unless
there are any strong objections. The idea is that these are automatically
generated from javadoc tags in the source code, so they probibly shouldn't
be present in the source distribution. Also, they're quite ugly and
incomplete at the moment so I doubt anyone will find them useful (yet).

regards

  [ bryce ]