Is it time to take the middle-end stringop/array warnings out of -Wall?

[Arsen Arsenović]

Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com> writes:

> The point is that if using -Wextra, you should expect some warnings
> that are "hard to avoid ... no simple way to modify the code to
> suppress the warning" (whereas such warnings are outside the
> documented scope of -Wall).

Yes, I agree.

I'm just saying that I think that, beyond just moving into -Wextra, the
wording needs to be made less certain ("there is" -> "there may be" or
so).
-- 
Arsen Arsenović
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 430 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20260521/b496d68c/attachment.sig>