Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

[Sam James]

Florian Weimer via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> * Giacomo Tesio:
>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:21:29 +0200 Christopher Albert  wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't publicly flag my use of AI 
>>> tools up to now because I was afraid that the contributions would get 
>>> rejected upfront due to unclear policy or strong opinions.
>>
>> for the record and future reference, can you please disclose what's the
>> first version of GCC including such LLM-generated code?
>
> Could you define what, exactly, “LLM-generated” means?

I think it's clear it means the same definition that Christopher Albert
used when he disclosed use.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20260424/00c2454a/attachment.sig>