Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

[Jerry D]

On 4/17/26 11:55 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 19:22, Jerry D via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> First I apologize for the broken thread, my email client, operator error.
>>
>> I sense a lot of contention from the text of this thread which I read off of the
>> archives.
>>
>> Since I started this thread, I thought I should step in.  I think folks may be
>> missing an important aspect of this.
> 
> I think you might be too.

No not really, the legal aspect is the whole reason I asked the question.
> 
--- snip ---
> 
> The topic of the thread has not been about whether the output is good
> quality or not.
> 
> It's about the legal status of the generated output, and whether that
> is something the project can accept.
> 

Indeed, like I said above . We gotta do it right.

Cheers,

Jerry