C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps

[Jason Merrill]

On 9/3/25 8:40 PM, Qing Zhao wrote:
> 
> I have one question (might be a stupid question):
> 
> Should we consider a call to C++’s constructor as the initialization to that variable?
> 
> For example:
> 
> S::S (&s);
> 
> Should we consider the above as an initialization to the variable s?
> then -ftrivial-auto-var-init should NOT insert the DEFFRRED_INIT to s?

The constructor might not fully initialize the variable, so I would keep 
the DEFERRED_INIT.

Jason