An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

[Jeff Law]

On 6/3/25 1:41 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:

> 
> What is not working with the current system?  What is this fixing?
It relies on the someone to shepherd the process and it's something that 
often gets pushed down on my daily todo list.  As a result nominations 
don't happen or are extremely delayed.

Additionally there's no visibility into the process.  It's a total black 
hole, particularly for cases where I'm on point.

This isn't necessarily a steering committee problem, but a time problem.

If we make things simpler for those cases where it is actually simple 
and increase visibility so that folks know state I think it would be a 
welcome improvement to the process.


Jeff