On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end.
Nathaniel Shead
nathanieloshead@gmail.com
Sun Feb 9 10:34:04 GMT 2025
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> Compare a standard gcc build:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html
>
> with this one using checking=all:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837708.html
>
> Other languages do not seem to be affected.
>
> A sample:
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error:
> Segmentation fault)
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C module-cmi xstd (gcm.cache/xstd.gcm)
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++2a (internal compiler error:
> Segmentation fault)
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C module-cmi xstd (gcm.cache/xstd.gcm)
>
> Hope this is useful.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
>
Thanks, I've reduced the issue with the modules testcases and created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118807 for this.
Nathaniel
More information about the Gcc
mailing list