Use of LLM for patches

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi Andrew,

On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 11:05:00PM -0800, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> Looks like we might get our first patch implemented via LLM. We should
> have an policy soon because it.
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122956 .
> 
> I think binutils policy[1] is a reasonable one to start with.

Agreed. It was based on the Cauldron discussion in Porto by Krzysztof,
the FSF licensing and compliance manager:
https://conf.gnu-tools-cauldron.org/opo25/talk/VMWHG7/
glibc also discussed using a (simplified) variant of the binutils policy:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/2693990.Sgy9Pd6rRy@noumea/
https://inbox.sourceware.org/0a344018-0d59-4719-8139-402c4254f19f@gotplt.org/

Cheers,

Mark

> [1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/LLM_Generated_Content