Use of LLM for patches
Richard Biener
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Mon Dec 15 09:00:35 GMT 2025
> Am 15.12.2025 um 08:06 schrieb Andrew Pinski via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
> Looks like we might get our first patch implemented via LLM. We should
> have an policy soon because it.
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122956 .
Impressive reasoning (sounds LLM-ish convincing). The patch is too large to trust though.
> I think binutils policy[1] is a reasonable one to start with.
Agreed. Is this sth for the SC to decide on?
Richard
> [1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/LLM_Generated_Content
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
More information about the Gcc
mailing list