Use of LLM for patches

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Mon Dec 15 09:00:35 GMT 2025



> Am 15.12.2025 um 08:06 schrieb Andrew Pinski via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>:
> 
> Looks like we might get our first patch implemented via LLM. We should
> have an policy soon because it.
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122956 .

Impressive reasoning (sounds LLM-ish convincing).  The patch is too large to trust though.

> I think binutils policy[1] is a reasonable one to start with.

Agreed.  Is this sth for the SC to decide on?

Richard 

> [1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/LLM_Generated_Content
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew


More information about the Gcc mailing list