[PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions

[Xi Ruoyao]

On Sat, 2024-07-06 at 00:01 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 17:53 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > At least, I hope there's consensus that while current GCC doesn't warn
> > about this, ideally it should, which means it should warn for valid uses
> > of strtol(3), which means strtol(3) should be fixed, in all of ISO,
> > POSIX, and glibc.
> 
> It **shouldn't**.  strtol will only violate restrict if it's wrongly
> implemented, or something dumb is done like "strtol((const char*) &p,
> &p, 0)".
> 
> See my previous reply.

Also even if we'll introduce an over-eager warning having many
positives, there are still many possibilities besides changing the
standard to satisfy such a warning.  For example, g++ -Wdangling-
reference has many false positives (IMO it's over-eager) so a
no_dangling attribute has been added to allow suppressing it.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University